Innovative Journal of Physiotherapy Logo

Innovative Journal of Physiotherapy

Published by SPJ Publications Pvt. Ltd.

ISSN: Awaited

Editor Guidelines

Overview

Welcome to the Innovative Journal of Physiotherapy, published by SPJ Publications. As an editor, you play an important role in advancing the journal's mission to disseminate high-quality, peer-reviewed, and open-access research that drives innovation in the field of medical imaging. These guidelines outline your key responsibilities and establish a unified framework for ethical, consistent, and professional editorial practices.

Role and Scope of the Editor

Editors are responsible for guiding manuscripts through every stage of the publication process, from initial submission to the final decision. The primary objective is to maintain the scientific quality, integrity, and relevance of all content published in the Innovative Journal of Physiotherapy. Editors must apply uniform standards, ensure fair and unbiased evaluation, and uphold the credibility and reputation of the journal.

Editorial Assessment and Manuscript Screening

Each submission should undergo an initial editorial assessment before being sent for peer review. Consider the following criteria when evaluating a manuscript:

  • Does the topic and scope align with the Journal's focus areas?
  • Is the research original, methodologically sound, and scientifically valid?
  • Are the study design and methods appropriate and adequately described?
  • Is the manuscript correctly formatted according to the Innovative Journal of Physiotherapy author guidelines?

Manuscripts that fail to meet these basic requirements may be returned to authors for revision or declined before peer review. Prompt and transparent communication with authors is essential during this stage.

Managing the Peer Review Process

Innovative Journal of Physiotherapy follows a double-blind peer review model to ensure unbiased assessment. Editorial duties in this process include:

  • Assigning reviewers with appropriate subject expertise and no conflicts of interest
  • Providing reviewers with clear guidance and adequate time, typically 2-3 weeks, to complete evaluations
  • Tracking review progress and sending courteous reminders when necessary
  • Maintaining anonymity between authors and reviewers throughout the process

Making Editorial Decisions

Upon receiving reviewers’ reports, editors should carefully assess the manuscript’s scientific merit, clarity, and contribution to the field. Final decisions must be based on reviewer input and editorial judgment. The following decision categories are used at the Innovative Journal of Physiotherapy:

Decision Meaning & Required Action
Accept as is The manuscript meets all standards and requires no further changes.
Accept after minor revision Only minor corrections or clarifications are needed. Revised version due within 5-7 days.
Reconsider after major revision Substantial revisions are required. The revised submission will undergo re-evaluation.
Reject with encouragement to resubmit The topic is relevant but requires significant improvement. Authors may submit a new version later.
Reject The article does not meet the journal's standards or falls outside its scope.

Ethical Oversight and Integrity

Editors serve as guardians of research ethics and must remain alert to potential issues such as:

  • Plagiarism or text duplication
  • Fabrication or falsification of data
  • Unethical research practices involving human or animal subjects
  • Undisclosed conflicts of interest
  • Redundant or duplicate publication

When ethical concerns arise, follow the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines and consult the Editor-in-Chief for further action. All manuscripts and related communications must remain strictly confidential.

Communication with Authors and Reviewers

Editors should maintain respectful, transparent, and professional communication at all times. Feedback, whether in revision instructions or rejection letters, should be clear, constructive, and designed to help authors improve their work. Timely communication fosters trust and strengthens the journal’s relationship with contributors.

Commitment to Open Science

Innovative Journal of Physiotherapy is committed to promoting open science principles. Editors should encourage data transparency and support authors in sharing datasets where applicable. Stay informed on best practices in open access, preprint publishing, and ethical research dissemination.

Confidentiality and Impartiality

All submissions are treated as confidential documents. Editors must not discuss manuscripts outside the editorial board or use unpublished data for personal gain. All decisions must be based purely on academic merit, independent of nationality, institutional affiliation, gender, or commercial influence.

Continuing Professional Development

Editors are encouraged to engage in ongoing professional development through training programs, workshops, and editorial networks. SPJ Publications periodically offers sessions on editorial ethics, peer review management, and new publishing standards to strengthen editorial expertise. Your commitment and leadership as an editor are vital to the ongoing success of the Innovative Journal of Physiotherapy. By adhering to these principles, you ensure that the Innovative Journal of Physiotherapy remains a respected and authoritative platform for advancing knowledge in medical imaging.

For further information or clarification, please contact the Editor-in-Chief at editor@ijopt.com

Las Update on: 03/01/2026